Comments on: How To Google-Proof Your Website

By: Diana MEYER

Diana MEYER — Sun, 16 Oct 2011 09:38:36 +0000

Great post, Thanks! Google has done a good job with Panda 😉

By: WebMarketing_Katy

WebMarketing_Katy — Fri, 30 Sep 2011 08:56:24 +0000

The headline got me. The post made me smile. But it certainly makes sense. Important especially for companies doing web marketing. Thanks for the tips.

By: Keyword Tips

Keyword Tips — Thu, 29 Sep 2011 01:50:05 +0000

I disagree. I think it will be easier in the future to rank, because after long Google has finally leveled the playing field for everyone. Panda was all about that. You put effort, you reap rewards. Doesn’t matter if you are a loner or a corp giant.

By: Marco Lee

Marco Lee — Thu, 29 Sep 2011 01:09:05 +0000

This one is good. Two of my sites has just had a plump in the traffic. One though has emerged and one is still on the low.

I highly agree with that social factors, aside from having a good social proof for the readers it also bring views as well.

The 2000 word page factor is new but I kind of agree with it intuitively.

By: Yvonne Hertzberger

Yvonne Hertzberger — Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:48:44 +0000

Interesting. I am still wrapping my head around the key word search idea and trying to figure out how to apply that to my website. Old brain=slow learning curve. As a writer of fiction it seems harder to find those words and incorporate them in a way that will be useful without losing the heart of the content. But certainly quality writing has to be a priority. If that helps me I am all for these clean-up filters. (I think that is what you mean by algorithm, right? or am I showing my ignorance?)

By: fox1977

fox1977 — Wed, 28 Sep 2011 12:53:40 +0000

Nice guide. Glad to have steered away from using the article sharing websites to drive traffic now. Heard a lot of bad stories about the panda undate. Although saying that the sites that have dropped down are not that great anyway.

By: Eric Mojstrovich

Eric Mojstrovich — Wed, 28 Sep 2011 02:59:55 +0000

Thanks Dave! Fortunately my small website wasn’t affected, but this is one for the bookmarks. When I release my bigger website I will be referring back to this article and taking your advice!

By: LaughstoHeal.com

LaughstoHeal.com — Tue, 27 Sep 2011 22:25:52 +0000

Great article, David, thanks! I didn’t know about the 2,000 word count, but it seems very reasonable when the intention is quality content. I agree with the suggestion of writing of other traffic sources as a way to truly Google-proof our sites and hope that will be seriously addressed.